“ေစာင့္ေလမ်ဳိးႏြယ္”

Share |
“ေကၽြးေမြးမပ်က္
ေဆာင္ရြက္စီမံ
ေမြခံထုိက္ေစ
လွဴမွ်ေ၀၍
ေစာင့္ေလမ်ဳိးႏြယ္
၀တ္ငါးသြယ္
က်င့္ဖြယ္သားတုိ႔တာ....”

ဒါကေတာ့ က်ေနာ္တုိ႔အားလုံးနီးနီး ဖတ္ဖူးၾကတဲ့ သားသမီး၀တ္ ငါးပါး ပါ။

အဲဒီငါးပါးထဲမွာ “ေစာင့္ေလမ်ဳိးႏြယ္” ဆုိတာပါတယ္။

တခ်ဳိ႕ကလည္း အဲဒါဟာ “မ်ဳိးႏြယ္ကုိ ေစာင့္ထိန္းရမယ္၊ ကုိယ္နဲ႔ မ်ဳိးႏြယ္မတူတဲ့လူကုိ လက္မထပ္ရဘူး”လုိ႔ တလြဲအဓိပၸါယ္ေကာက္ၿပီး ႏုိင္ငံျခားသားနဲ႔ လက္ထပ္ယူရင္ပဲျဖစ္ျဖစ္၊ တႏုိင္ငံတည္းသားခ်င္းျဖစ္လွ်င္ေတာင္ မ်ဳိးႏြယ္မတူတဲ့ အျခားလူမ်ဳိးစု မ်ဳိးႏြယ္၀င္ တေယာက္ေယာက္နဲ႔ လက္ထပ္ယူရင္ျဖစ္ျဖစ္…. “အမ်ဳိးမေစာင့္ထိန္းသူ” ဆုိၿပီး အသားလြတ္ စြတ္စြဲ အျပစ္တင္ခ်င္ၾကေသးတာ။

ေနာက္တမ်ဳိး အဓိပၸါယ္ တလြဲယူတာရွိေသးတယ္။ မိဘက ကုန္သည္မ်ဳိးႏြယ္ဆုိရင္ ကုိယ့္က်ရင္လည္း ကုန္သည္ပဲလုပ္ရမယ္။ မိဘက မင္းမႈထမ္းမ်ဳိးႏြယ္ဆုိရင္ ကိုယ့္အလွည့္က်ရင္လည္း မင္းမႈထမ္းလုပ္ရမယ္… ဆုိၿပီး အဓိပၸါယ္ယူတာမ်ဳိးေပါ႔။ ႀကံႀကံဖန္ဖန္ဗ်ာ။ အဲသည္လုိဆုိရင္ လူအေတာ္မ်ားမ်ားဟာ “ေစာင့္ေလမ်ဳိးႏြယ္” ဆုိတဲ့ ၀တ္ကုိ မေက်ပြန္ဘူး ျဖစ္ကုန္ၾကေတာ့မွာေပါ႔။ ဘာေၾကာင့္လဲဆုိေတာ ့ ဒီဖက္ေခတ္မွာ အေဖ့လက္ထက္တုန္းက လယ္သမား။ သားလက္ထက္က်ေတာ့ ဆရာ၀န္၊ အင္ဂ်င္နီယာ၊ ေက်ာင္းဆရာ ဆုိတာမ်ဳိးေတြ ျဖစ္ကုန္ၾကတာမဟုတ္လား။

တကယ္ေတာ့ ေစာင့္ေလမ်ဳိးႏြယ္ဆုိတာ အဲဒါေတြကုိ ဆုိလုိတာ မဟုတ္ပါဘူး။ ဦးခင္ေမာင္၀င္း ေရးသားတဲ့ “ဗုဒၶရဲ႕ လူမႈေရးတရားေတာ္မ်ား” စာအုပ္ ထဲမွာ ရွင္းျပထားတာ ရွိပါတယ္။ မိဘလက္ထက္က သီလဂုဏ္၊ သမာဓိဂုဏ္၊ ဘာ၀နာဂုဏ္၊ ႐ုိးဂုဏ္၊ အက်င့္ေကာင္း၊ စ႐ုိက္ေကာင္း၊ စိတ္ဓါတ္ေကာင္းေတြကုိ သားသမီးလက္ထက္မွာ ဆက္လက္ထိန္းသိမ္းပါ ဆုိတဲ့ အဓိပၸါယ္ ျဖစ္ပါသတဲ့။ က်ေနာ္လည္း အဲသည္ အဓိပၸါယ္ ဖြင့္ဆုိခ်က္ကုိ ႏွစ္သက္လက္ခံပါတယ္။

ေနာက္တခ်က္ ဂ႐ုျပဳသင့္တာက သားသမီးေတြဟာ မိဘေတြထက္ မစြမ္းရင္ေတာင္ မေလ်ာ့ေအာင္ေတာ့ ႀကဳိးစားသင့္ၾကတယ္ ဆုိတဲ့အခ်က္ပါပဲ။ မိဘလက္ထက္က စြမ္းစြမ္းတမံ ႀကဳိးစားခဲ့သေလာက္၊ တာ၀န္ေက်ခဲ့သေလာက္ သားသမီးလက္ထက္ေရာက္ေတာ့ ႀကဳိးလည္း မႀကဳိးစားဘူး၊ တာ၀န္လည္းမေက်ဘူးဆုိရင္ အဲဒီ သားသမီးဟာ မိဘရဲ႕ မ်ဳိးႏြယ္ဂုဏ္ကုိ မေစာင့္ထိန္းရာ ေရာက္ေနတယ္လုိ႔ ျမင္မိပါတယ္။

ယေန႔ ပတ္၀န္းက်င္မွာ ေလ့လာၾကည့္လုိက္ရင္ အခ်ဳိ႕ေသာ သားသမီးအခ်ဳိ႕ဟာ မိဘထက္ အရည္အခ်င္းအားျဖင့္ မေခၾကေသာ္လည္း တာ၀န္ေက်မႈေနရာမွာေတာ့ မိဘေျခဖ်ားကုိေတာင္ မမီတာေတြ ေတြ႕ရပါတယ္။ ႐ူးခ်င္ေယာင္ေဆာင္ၿပီး တာ၀န္ကုိ ေရွာင္လႊဲေနတာမ်ဳိးေတြေပါ႔။

တခ်ဳိ႕က်ေတာ့ အရည္အခ်င္းအားျဖင့္ မိဘကုိ မမီေသာ္လည္း တာ၀န္ေက်မႈအရာမွာေတာ့ မိဘထက္ မေလ်ာ့ရေလေအာင္ ႀကဳိးစားေနၾကသူေတြကုိလည္း ျမင္ရပါတယ္။

က်ေနာ္က ပထမအမ်ဳိးအစားကုိ အားမလုိအားမရျဖစ္သေလာက္ ဒုတိယအမ်ဳိးအစားကုိေတာ့ ခ်စ္ခင္ေလးစားမိပါတယ္။

အဲ… တတိယအမ်ဳိးအစားကေတာ့ မေကာင္းတဲ့ဘက္မွာ ေစာင့္ေလမ်ဳိးႏြယ္လုပ္ေနတာပါပဲ။ ျမန္မာျပည္က (နအဖ ဆုိတဲ့) အုပ္ခ်ဳပ္သူလူတန္းစားေတြရဲ႕ မိသားစုအသုိင္းအ၀ုိင္းေတြမွာ ျမင္ႏုိင္ပါတယ္။ မိဘက မဟုတ္တာေတြလုပ္။ သားသမီး၊ ေျမးျမစ္လက္ထက္မွာ ဆယ္ဆတုိးၿပီး မဟုတ္တာေတြလုပ္။ သူတုိ႔ရဲ႕ ေဆြစဥ္မ်ဳိးဆက္ မ်ဳိး႐ုိးဟာ တဆင့္ထက္တဆင့္ ပုိ၍ ပုိ၍ ယုတ္ညံ့ နိမ့္ဆင္းသြားပါတယ္။ အဲသည္တတိယအမ်ဳိးအစားကုိေတာ့ မစင္ဘင္ပုတ္သဖြယ္ ရြံရွာမိပါတယ္။

ေစာင့္ေလမ်ဳိးႏြယ္ ဆုိတာနဲ႔ ပတ္သက္လုိ႔ ျမန္မာျပည္မွာ က်ေနာ္အေလးစားဆုံးနဲ႔ ဂုဏ္အယူမိဆုံး မ်ဳိး႐ုိးကေတာ့ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္တုိ႔ မ်ဳိး႐ုိးပါ။ အဘုိး ၿမဳိ႕လုလင္ရြာသူႀကီး ဗုိလ္လေရာင္လက္ထက္ကစလုိ႔ ဗုိလ္ခ်ဳပ္ေအာင္ဆန္းလက္ထက္၊ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္လက္ထက္တုိင္ အာဇာနည္မ်ဳိး႐ုိးပီပီ သတၱိဗ်တၱိနဲ႔ ညီတဲ့၊ ႏွလုံးရည္နဲ႔ ျပည့္စုံတဲ့၊ ႐ုိးသားပြင့္လင္းတဲ့၊ ျပည္သူလူထုအေပၚ ေမတၱာေစတနာအျပည့္ထားတဲ့ ေဆြစဥ္မ်ဳိးဆက္ အစဥ္အဆက္ဂုဏ္ကုိ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္လက္ထက္အထိ လက္ဆင့္ကမ္းေစာင့္ထိန္းႏုိင္ခဲ့တာကုိ ေလးစားဂုဏ္ယူဖြယ္ ေတြ႕ျမင္ရပါတယ္။

ဆရာဦးေအာင္သင္းကေတာ့ သူ႕တပည့္ေတြကုိ ဆုေပးလုိ႔ရွိရင္…. “ကုိယ့္မိကုိယ့္ဖထက္ တဆင့္ျမႇင့္ၿပီး ပုခုံးစြမ္းအားေကာင္းတဲ့ ေယာက္်ားေကာင္း၊ ေယာက္်ားျမတ္၊ မိန္းမေကာင္း၊ မိန္းမျမတ္ေတြ ျဖစ္ၾကပါေစ…” ဆုိတဲ့ ဆုကေလး အပုိထည့္ၿပီး ဆုေပးသတဲ့။

ႏုိင္ငံေရး၊ စီးပြားေရး၊ လူမႈေရး၊ ပညာေရး၊ အႏုပညာ နယ္ပယ္အသီးသီးမွာ ေစာင့္ေလမ်ဳိးႏြယ္ဆုိတဲ့အတုိင္း ကုိယ့္မိဘလက္ထက္က ေကာင္းတဲ့ ဂုဏ္အဂၤါေတြကို ဆက္လက္ေစာင့္ထိန္းၾကလွ်င္၊ ကုိယ့္မိကုိယ့္ဖထက္ တဆက္တက္ၿပီး တာ၀န္ယူႏုိင္ဖုိ႔ ႀကဳိးစားၾကလွ်င္ျဖင့္ ကုိယ့္ပတ္၀န္းက်င္ ကုိယ့္ေလာကကုိ ယခုထက္ပုိ၍ အလွဆင္ႏုိင္လိမ့္မည္ဟု ေတြးမိပါေၾကာင္း……။

ျဖည့္စြက္ခ်က္။...........။ ဦးခင္ေမာင္၀င္း၏ စကားအတိအက်မွာ “အမ်ဳိးအႏြယ္အားျဖင့္ အစဥ္လာေသာ ဒါန၀တ္၊ သီလ၀တ္၊ အစရွိေသာ အေလ့ေကာင္း၊ အက်င့္ေကာငး္၊ အ႐ုိးေကာင္း၊ အစဥ္ေကာင္းတုိ႔ကုိ မပ်က္ေစရျခင္း တစ္ပါး” ဟူ၍ ျဖစ္ပါသည္။ ေဆာင္းပါးေရးစဥ္က စာအုပ္အနီးတြင္ ရွိမေန၍ စကားအသုံးအႏႈန္းအနည္းငယ္ လြဲမွားသြားသည္ကုိ ေတာင္းပန္ပါသည္။

54 comments:

khin oo may said...

ေဆြးေနြးၿကတာေတြ ကုိ ဆက္ၿပီး ေစာင္႕ဖတ္လုိက္ဦးမယ္ကုိေပါ။

(ရုးခ်င္ေယာင္ေဆာင္သြားသည္)။

Tin said...

Ko paw ,
Me too, but not pretended to crazy . :-).
bcoz,
Already crazy. :-).../\-/\.
You should write topic about. " How to Live and Die a Singapore ".

maung said...

ကိုေပါေရးထားတာ ေကာင္းပါတယ္။
တခုသိခ်င္တာက ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ရဲ႕ ေနာက္ မ်ဳိးဆက္ေတြကေရာ ... ကိုေပါ ...
သူတို႔ဘာေတြလုပ္ေနၾကသလဲ။
ေဒၚစုလက္ထက္ထိ ေစာင့္ထိန္းခဲ့တဲ့ မ်ဳိး႐ိုးဂုဏ္ကို သူတို႔ ဆက္လက္ လက္ဆင့္ကမ္း ေစာင့္ထိန္းႏိုင္ၾကမလား/ ႏိုင္ၾကသလား?
ေစာင့္ေလမ်ဳိးႏြယ္အရ ဘယ္ဘက္က အမ်ဳိးဂုဏ္ကို အေလးထား ေစာင့္ထိန္းၾကမလဲ၊ ဘယ္ဘက္က အမ်ဳိးကို ပိုၿပီး ေက်းဇူးျပဳၾကမလဲ။
ေသခ်ာတာကေတာ့ အေနာက္ႏိုင္ငံရဲ႕ ထံုးစံအရ နာမည္ရဲ႕ေနာက္မွာ အေဖဘက္က မ်ဳိး႐ိုးနာမည္ ထည့္ရသလို အေဖဘက္ရဲ႕ အမ်ဳိးဂုဏ္ကို ေစာင့္ထိန္းဖို႔ အလားအလာက ပိုမ်ားေနသလိုပဲ။ ေတြးမိတာေျပာတာပါ။

ကိုယ့္မိဘ၊ ကိုယ့္အမ်ဳိး၊ ကိုယ့္တိုင္းျပည္ ဆိုတာကို ခဏေမ့ၿပီး ေယဘုယ် သေဘာမ်ဳိးေတြးၾကည့္ရင္ေတာ့ ေစာင့္ေလမ်ဳိးႏြယ္သည္ လူသားမ်ဳိးႏြယ္ကို ေစာင့္ထိန္းျခင္းလို႔ ယူဆၿပီး စစ္ပြဲေတြရပ္ဆဲ၊ လက္နက္ေတြ ဖ်က္သိမ္း၊ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးကို အားလံုး ေရွ႕႐ႈၿပီး ေမတၱာတရား ထားႏိုင္ၾကမယ္ဆိုရင္ျဖင့္ ေလာကႀကီးကို ဒီထက္ပိုၿပီး အလွဆင္ႏိုင္မယ္ ထင္တာပါပဲ။

ေနညိဳရင့္ said...

ဦးခင္ေမာင္၀င္း ရွင္းျပထားတဲ့ အခ်က္ေတြကို သေဘာက်တယ္ဗ်ာ။ မိဘမ်ိဳးႏြယ္ေတြ လမ္းမွားခဲ့ရင္ သားသမီးေတြက လမ္းမွန္ေပၚ ျပန္တည့္ေပးဖို ့လိုပါတယ္။ မိဘမ်ိဳးႏြယ္ေတြ လမ္းမွားေနတာကို သားသမီးေတြက ဆက္ကာကြယ္ ေပးေနရင္ေတာ့ "ေစာင့္ေလမ်ိဳးႏြယ္" ဆိုတာ မွန္ကန္မွ်တမွုမရွိတဲ့ လူမွုအဖဲြ ့အစည္းကို ၾကီးထြားေအာင္ လုပ္ေနတာနဲ ့ အတူတူပါပဲ။ အဲဒီမွာ အဓိက အခ်က္က သားသမီးက ဒါဟာ မွားပါတယ္လို ့ ေထာက္ျပတာကို ျပဳျပင္ရဲတဲ့၊ ငါလုပ္တာဟာ မွားသြားပါတယ္ဆိုတဲ့ ၀န္ခံရဲတဲ့ အျမင္သတိၱ၊ လူၾကီးမိဘ ေတြမွာ ရွိေနဖို ့ပါ။ ျပီးေတာ့ အဲလိုထုတ္ေဖာ္ေျပာရဲတဲ့ သားသမီး ျဖစ္ေနဖို ့လဲ ပထမ အေရးၾကီးပါတယ္ ထင္ပါတယ္ဗ်ာ။ ထင္တာ ျမင္တာေတြကို ေဆြးေႏြးလို ့ရတဲ့ အတြက္ ေက်းဇူးပါဗ်ာ။

မိုးခါး said...

ဖတ္သြားမွတ္သြားပါတယ္ ..

wai said...

Ko Paw,
It is a nice post. I do like it.
I always tell to my Thai friends that after 100 years, Thai people will be with blue eyes and golden hairs.
My career is related with Genetic conservation. Every nationality has unique characters. We need to conserve it. Thats why we can say we are Myanmar, Thailand, Japan, etc.......Your opinion is also good. Anyway, my hero is Daw Aung Sun Suu Kyi eventhough I don't like her marriage.

ေမာင္လမ္းသစ္ said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

mg lan thit..wat the hell r u???

Anonymous said...

sry ko paw, my comment is not related to ur post!

Law Shay said...

သာဓု သာဓု သာဓု

Ko Paw said...

ေမာင္လမ္းသစ္ေရ…. လူမ်ဳိးေရးခြဲျခားတဲ့စကားေတြ ေျပာလွခ်ည္လားဗ်ာ။ ျမန္မာလူမ်ဳိးဆုိတာေရာ ဘယ္က ဆင္းသက္လာတာလဲ။ ေျပာစမ္းပါဦး။ ပုဂံေဒသေအာက္တည့္တည့္ ေျမႀကီးထဲက ထြက္လာတာလား။ ဒါမွမဟုတ္ မုိးေပၚက က်လာတာလား။ အတိတ္ကုိ ျပန္ေျပာင္းၾကည့္လုိက္ပါဦး။ ေမာင္လမ္းသစ္ ကုိယ္ထဲမွာေရာ ေမာင္လမ္းသစ္ေျပာတဲ့ ကုလားေသြးေတြ၊ တ႐ုတ္ေသြးေတြ လုံး၀ မပါတာ ေသခ်ာၿပီးလား။ ေနာက္ၿပီး ကိုလမ္းသစ္ ဘာ ဘာသာကုိးကြယ္သလဲ။ ဗုဒၶဘာသာကုိးကြယ္တယ္ဆုိရင္ ဗုဒၶက ဘယ္ႏုိင္ငံကလဲ။ အစၥလမ္ဘာသာကုိးကြယ္ရင္ မုိဟာမက္က ဘယ္ႏုိင္ငံကလဲ။ ခရစ္ယာန္ကုိးကြယ္တယ္ဆုိရင္ ေယ႐ႈက ဘယ္ႏုိင္ငံကလဲ။

လူမ်ဳိးျခားကုိ ကုိးကြယ္ေနၿပီးတဲ့ေနာက္မွေတာ့ ႏုိင္ငံျခားသားယူတာေလာက္ေတာ့ စကားထဲ ထည့္ေျပာေနဖုိ႔ လုိေသးလုိ႔လားဗ်ာ။

Anonymous said...

Nga Paw,

Let ur daughter to get mariage with kalar

So upset ! :(

Dont know what kind of person (nga paw) u r

မ်ဳိးျမင့္ေမာင္ said...

အဟဲ...ဗုဒၶဘာသာ ျမန္မာေတြထဲက ကုလားေတြကုိ လူမ်ဳိးေရးအရ ခြဲျခားဆက္ဆံသူေတြ ဘုရား႐ွိခုိးတဲ့အခါ ဗုဒၶကုိ မ်က္ႏွာမပူဘူးလားဗ်ာ။

Anonymous said...

sincerity is the best thing....

Whateve U do...

or

U say...!

U Don't have to pretend...

or

Don't juz Follow Others' Nonsense...

It's your own Life...

Ko Boyz said...

ဗိုလ္မင္းေရာင္န႔ဲ ဗိုလ္လေရာင္ ဘာကြာလဲ...။

Anonymous said...

KP and MMM,

u should know, most of MM ppl have that kind biased racial views, to say the truth. they think burmese r great and the rest are so substandard. they promote racial purity. just make a poll in ygn and mdly, randomly. and u will get the answer..

minorities in MM know that wat they need to fight is not only the junta, but also the burmese also..

does the truth upset u all? anyway its one and only truth - truth abt MM..

ppl are conservative and narrow-minded. they don't know the truth meaning of democratic or freedom or rights. they r not happy with gov coz they r starved. once the gov can feed them, they will support the gov.

why do u think MM is under the authoritarian rulers for most of time? do u think it will survive without any institution or social structure supporting it?

I believe u know the answer judging from some of ur posts..

but the problem is u all believe in utopia downplay truth..

thats all for now.

Anonymous said...

but the problem is u all believe in utopia and downplay the truth..

Bino said...

ယေန႔ ပတ္၀န္းက်င္မွာ ေလ့လာၾကည့္လုိက္ရင္ အခ်ဳိ႕ေသာ သားသမီးအခ်ဳိ႕ဟာ မိဘထက္ အရည္အခ်င္းအားျဖင့္ မေခၾကေသာ္လည္း တာ၀န္ေက်မႈေနရာမွာေတာ့ မိဘေျခဖ်ားကုိေတာင္ မမီတာေတြ ေတြ႕ရပါတယ္။ ႐ူးခ်င္ေယာင္ေဆာင္ၿပီး တာ၀န္ကုိ ေရွာင္လႊဲေနတာမ်ဳိးေတြေပါ႔။
That is me.
I try to support to my parents.
Around 5 percent done.

Let me say something.
I will knock the gang.
In agriculture, genetic scientists to alter a plant or animal to make it more useful and higher quality. Tomatoes and apples have been modified so that they resist discoloration or bruising on their way, enhancing their appeal on supermarket shelves. The genetic makeup of cows has been modified to increase their milk production, and cattle raised for beef have been altered so that they grow faster.
That theory of genetic apply to human being......DNA change.....
Some group will noise, some group will fight.
Bino

Anonymous said...

Ko Paw.....I always enjoy reading your posts. Can you tell me what to do as I can't read the comments? The squares are coming up. Thanks!

Ko Paw said...

Anonymous (3.04AM)..... Please click on "the post title". You will see the comments under the post (in Burmese fonts).

But if you click on the comments, it will go to the "post a comment on" page and if your zawgyi font is not the latest version, you will only see the squares.

Therefore, the easiest way is to click on the post title. Another way is to download and install the latest zawgyi font.

ခ်စ္ျပံဳးႏွင္းဆီ said...

ကိုေပါရာ
မွန္လိုက္ေလ
ဒီထက္မွန္တာ ထပ္ေျပာမယ္ဗ်ာ

ျမန္မာမေတြအကုန္ ႏိုင္ငံျခားသားေတြနဲ့သာယူလိုက္ၾကေတာ့။
ပီးရင္ မိဘမ်ိဳးရိုးဂုဏ္ကို ဆက္ထိန္းသိမ္းလိုက္ေပါ့။

ျမန္မာဆိုတဲ့ အမ်ိဳးလဲ ေပ်ာက္သြားတာေပါ့။ ေအးသြားတာေပါ့ဗ်ာ။ မဟုတ္ဘူးလား။
ဒီလိုေစာင့္ေလမ်ိဳးႏြယ္ လုပ္လဲ ရသားပဲဗ်ာ့

ကိုယ့္သမီးလဲ ကုလားနဲ့ၾကိဳက္လဲ ေပးသာေပးစားလိုက္ပါဗ်ာ။

ကိုေပါေရးသမ်ွေကာင္းပါ၏

Anonymous said...

ငေပါ တိထၳိ စိတ္ပ်က္ပါ၏

Anonymous said...

If...

U are Myanmar National...


U can't maintain your Myanmar Traditional Systems

&

Your Own-Myanmar ' Generation...

WHO Will..?

Even Though The Whole World is Flat Enough in these days.....!!!

Do U Care..?

Ko Paw said...

စိတ္သေဘာထားႀကီးတဲ့ လူမ်ဳိးျခားဟာ စိတ္သေဘာထားေသးသိမ္တဲ့ ဗမာေယာက္်ားတခ်ဳိ႕ထက္ေတာ့ အပုံႀကီး သာပါေသးတယ္။ လူကုိ လူလုိပဲ ျမင္ပါတယ္။ လူမ်ဳိးေရးအျမင္က်ဥ္းေျမာင္းတာမ်ဳိးကုိ မႏွစ္ၿခဳိက္ပါဘူး။

က်ေနာ့္သမီးႀကီးလာလုိ႔ရွိရင္ သူဟာသူ ႏွစ္သက္တဲ့လူကုိ ယူခြင့္ေပးမွာပါ။

အရြယ္ေရာက္ၿပီး လူတဦးရဲ႕ ေရြးခ်ယ္ပုိင္ခြင့္ကို က်ေနာ္က ၀င္ေရာက္ဖိအားေပး စြက္ဖက္မွာမဟုတ္ပါ။ သမီးငယ္စဥ္မွာ လုိအပ္တဲ့ ေတြးေခၚစဥ္းစားဉာဏ္ ရင့္သန္ေအာင္ပဲ ျပဳစုပ်ဳိးေထာင္ေပးမွာပါ။

မ်ဳိးျမင့္ေမာင္ said...

To Anon:

Actually, both Ko Paw and I accept that many aspects of the Burmese culture are supportive of authoritarianism as a fact. If you had read Ko Paw's blog regularly, you would know that Ko Paw had posted a number of articles on that issue. So, why did you accuse us of downplaying the truth?

Also, you must know that culture is not unchangeable. Like every other culture, the Burmese culture has a potential for change and progress. But, the iron rule of the current military dictatorship is serving as the most powerful factor in reinforcing the status quo and resisting change. Therefore, the conclusion that Burma will have this kind of authoritarian rule as long as the Burmese culture is unchanged is sort of a self-fulfilling prophecy.

So how should we break the vicious circle of the Burmese culture and authoritarian rule? Ko Paw and I advocate the replacement of the military dictatorship by democracy. Not because we think that democracy is Utopia, but it is the best possible option Burma has. On the other hand, more and more pluralistic ideas and values should be introduced to the Burmese society. But, here again, the military rule is the biggest obstacle for that. In my opinion, the military dictatorship is more deterrent to cultural change than the Burmese culture is to political change. Burma is more familiar with democracy than with pluralism. Hasn't there been a struggle for democracy for over twenty years? Though the desired political change is not realized yet, I think it has a greater possibility than a fundamental change in the Burmese culture.

Just my two cents. :D

မ်ဳိးျမင့္ေမာင္ said...

ေၾသာ္...ဒီေလာက္ေတာင္ လူမ်ဳိးေရးစည္းျခားခ်င္ၾကရင္ ျမန္မာနဲ႔ႏုိင္ငံျခားသားရယ္မွ မဟုတ္ဘူး။ ဗမာနဲ႔ က်န္တဲ့တုိင္းရင္းသားေတြလည္း မယူၾကနဲ႔လုိ႔ ေျပာၾကပါဦးလားဗ်။ လူမ်ဳိးကုိေစာင့္ထိန္းမယ္ဆုိလည္း လုပ္မွလုပ္ အျပတ္လုပ္ပါလား။

ေကာင္းကင္ကို said...

ဦးခင္ေမာင္ဝင္း ဖြင့္ထားတဲ့ အဓိပါယ္ေလး ၾကိဳက္တယ္ဗ်ာ။ လူ ့ေလာကၾကီး ဒါမွ ျမင့္သထက္ ျမင့္လာမယ္ထင္တယ္။

Anonymous said...

Hi MMM,

thanks for discussing without accusing me of my poor english and anonymity.

I know there are some fundamental views that we share.

I believe that military government is not a good option for MM and u believe it too.

But I believe that going straight to liberal democracy is not feasible coz MM doesn't have institutions or social structure to support liberal democracy, just yet.

Burmese were under feudalism just under 200 years ago before burmese feudalism was swept away by the tide of colonialism. and later burma got independence when a handful of leaders had political enlightenment. and burma went into civil war because those enlightened political leaders failed to build a common social and political view to stay together. so as u can see, history did not favor burmese majority to be familiar with any ideologies.

but im not saying we can't have liberal democracy just like the west. when we have the right social structure, liberal democracy will be just born of its social structure without receiving anybody's help.

bearing in mind that no ideology or society is perfect, i believe that soft-authoritarian government which interest is aligned with 50 millions of MM ppl is the best option we can have. starting from soft-authoritarian society, MM will eventually evolves towards more democratic countries. but it will take time.

just take a look at through out asia, no country is a truly democratic country yet. every promising asian countries had to walk the road of soft-authoritarian government. even japan had to stay under direct US military administration when it was rebuilding the country after the war. some countries like SG and malaysia is still under the tight hands of their founding leaders. but they all r inching towards more liberal and democratic society pushing the limitation of their social structure.

india is the most and longest democratic country in asia. but poverty and corruption is still rampant there. rich and poor divide is so great. it shows that democracy, poverty and corruption can still go hand in hand as long as the society accept them.

so we burmese r better than the rest of the asians to go straight into liberal democracy?

if the answer is no, then we should advocate gradual relaxation of authoritarian rules in MM and evolving towards more liberal and democratic society.

all the best..

Anonymous said...

Ko paw, i agree wt yr comment at 11:46 a.m.

Anonymous said...

I disagree with some of you in critisizing Daw Su marriage. Even though she married to a Brit,
she managed to send her sons in Buddhist novice hood.

Being Burmese comes with
respecting Buddhist tradition, religion, keep Burmese name,
and so he (Dr. Michael is more Burmese for me than an Anyar
thar who beat own monks or who
sucks foreigners, foreign faith
for hand outs, I dont like opposition s..kers for sucking
up foreigners allowing them to
tarnish the reputation of Buddhist religion, my faith).

To make it short, I approved Daw Su marriage to Dr. Michael more than if she were to married a government or opposition s..kers.
A sucker is a sucker no matter whose d..k he sucks.

Anonymous said...

Hey guys...

Regarding foreign-marriage & identity of Nationality...

U cannot complain and guide to others' people life...

U need to control your own-life & your generation..first..

and talk about others... later...

it's responsibility..for every patriotic people for their own country and their national identity...

The world's whatever Flat...
However globalization goes...

Nice day..

Anonymous said...

for above anoym...
are you talking about alot of people' changing s'poren citizen..nowdays ..?
for the sake of only materials reason and just to avoid money income tax to myanmar..?
is't the reason of patriotic identity..?
easily changing their generation of myanmar national' identity to others artificial identity..?
some people are even proud to become..?
explain..?

Anonymous said...

အဲလိုမ်ိဳး ထိန္းၾကတာေကာင္းပါတယ္... ျပီးရင္ ဂီးနစ္ထဲ ထဲ့ေပါ့...
ဒါမ်ိဳးက ဒီတနိုင္ငံထဲရွိတာေလ.. ဟုတ္တယ္ဟုတ္..

Anonymous said...

ကမၻာေပၚမွာ ရွိရွိသမွ် တျခားနိုင္ငံေတြက အမ်ိဳးေတြ မွန္သမွ် အယုတ္ညံ့ေတြခ်ည္း ပဲကိုး... ခုမွသိတယ္

Rita said...

ဒီ post ကို သေဘာက် ႏွစ္ၿခိဳက္မိပါတယ္။

"သားသမီးေတြက မိဘေတြရဲ႕ ေကာင္းမြန္တဲ့ သမိုင္းေၾကာင္းကို ဆက္လက္ ထိန္းသိမ္းၿပီး ျမင့္မား တိုးတက္ေစရမယ္" ဆုိတာကို လက္ခံမိပါတယ္။ ေကာင္းမြန္တဲ့ သမိုင္းေၾကာင္းဆိုမွေတာ့ မိဘက္ ဖဘက္ ဘယ္သူ႕ဘက္ရယ္လို႕ ထည့္ေျပာေနစရာ မလိုေတာ့ဘူးလို႕လဲ ယူဆမိပါတယ္။

ေနာက္တခုက သားသမီး ဆိုတာ မိဘကို ေရြးခ်ယ္ခြင့္ မရွိတာမို႕ မိဘ တဦးဦးဘက္က ဆုိးေမြေတြ ရွိခဲ့ရင္လည္း ေခ်ဖ်က္ေျပာင္းလဲ ႏိုင္ေစရမယ္ေပါ့။ ဒီေနရာမွာလည္း ဘယ္သူ႕ဘက္ရယ္လို႕ ထည့္ေျပာေနဖို႕ မလိုပါဘူး။

ေကာင္းတာမြန္တာေတြကို လက္ဆင့္ကမ္း တိုးတက္ေစမယ္ ဆိုတဲ့ အေတြးအျမင္ကို ႏွစ္ၿခိဳက္မိပါတယ္။

Anonymous said...

Ko paw, i also agree with your comment at May 1, 11:46 a.m

မ်ဳိးျမင့္ေမာင္ said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
မ်ဳိးျမင့္ေမာင္ said...

To Anon:

Although I agree with you that Burma would not be able to achieve liberal democracy right away, I don't agree with your view that a soft-authoritarian regime would be good enough for Burma in the meantime.

One reason is that I regard authoritarianism is immoral and the most fundamental problem of Burma. Rape by any means is a crime, regardless of the degree of ruthlessness of the rapist. So is authoritarianism, no matter whether it is soft or harsh.

Another reason is that I believe replacing the current military dictatorship with a soft-authoritarian regime is unrealistic and unfeasible. How could the current dictatorship, one of the most ruthless in the world, be convinced to become more humane? The dictators have been indulging themselves in arbitrary power for decades. Appealing the current dictatorship to become more humane is sort of like appealing to a ruthless serial rapist to rape you more gently this time. If you think replacing the current regime with a new bunch of soft authoritarians, from where would they come and how would they topple the current dictatorship? With the support of the people or without it? If the people could replace the current regime with a new one, why should they choose a new authoritarian regime rather than a democratic one? If the new authoritarian regime could do it without the people, why would they be less authoritarian while they could wield absolute power like their predecessors?

I think democracy is still the best possible option for Burma. It's true that liberal democracy could not be achieved right away, and rampant corruption and other problems would continue for a certain period. But, if there is a genuine political change in Burma, the bottom line should be a democratic constitution that guarantees free election. I think a constitutional mechanism that enables the people to effectively elect the government could possibly be achieved. Take Indonesia for an example. There are still corruption and other chronic problems in Indonesia nowadays after the iron rule of Soeharto. However, it is a burgeoning democracy in contrast to the soft-authoritarian Singapore, where there has been no genuine progress towards democracy for decades. In terms of politics, I think Burma doesn't necessarily have to undergo the same fate of Singapore. Instead, I would like to advocate Burma to follow the path of Indonesia.

Ko Paw said...

Good Answer, Myo Myint Maung. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Hi MMM,

I need to highlight that the "iron rule of Suharto" did increase living standard of indonesia.

during his era, he kept religious extremists at bay and spearheaded the national development. He did lift Indonesia to the status of one of the asian tigers.

that was how, as one of a typical asian country, indonesia under Suharto walked the road of soft-authoritarian road before it was a "burgeoning democracy".

မ်ဳိးျမင့္ေမာင္ said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
မ်ဳိးျမင့္ေမာင္ said...

Bringing economic growth doesn't mean being soft-authoritarian. Being relatively secular doesn't mean that either. A relatively secular and pro-development regime could be a very harsh dictatorship. In fact, Soeharto's "New Order" regime was an example.

Read about the genocidal atrocities in East Timor and the dire abuses of human rights in Aceh all committed by his regime. His regime also ordered the military to shoot the student protesters during the period of the Reformasi movement. Furthermore, it even instigated a catastrophic racial riot targeted to the Chinese community during that period. So, how could Soeharto's regime have been soft-authoritarian by any standard?

If you think Soeharto's regime was soft-authoritarian, you don't need to advocate replacing the current Burmese military regime with a soft-authoritarian regime. Because you've already got one in Burma now.

Anonymous said...

Hi MMM,

I agree with you that he committed atrocities in East Timor.

But I need to highlight again that "the genocidal atrocities in East Timor and the dire abuses of human rights in Aceh" are all back by Henery Kissenger and Gerald Ford.

Pls find out more about these events in any libraries in Singapore.

Anyway we have agree upon on two things -

1. Military government is not a good option for MM
2. Burma would not be able to achieve liberal democracy right away

But we can't agree on whether or not MM should start off with soft-authoritarian government.

Thanks for discussion.

We will continue again.

Anonymous said...

MMM and Anoym agreed that as follows....

Anyway we have agree upon on two things -

1. Military government is not a good option for MM

2. Burma would not be able to achieve liberal democracy right away..

Sorry guys...

Even Primary kids also know it...

what's the value of discussion..?

showing howmuch you knew and come out agreement like that..?

Wake up guys..!

မ်ဳိးျမင့္ေမာင္ said...

To the second Anon:

Thanks for pointing out that. I am really glad to know that the primary kids in Burma nowadays are so intelligent that they know what liberal democracy is and why it cannot be achieved by Burma in the short term.

Anyway, the main focus of our discussion was on whether Burma should start with soft authoritarianism to achieve liberal democracy ultimately. The two unimportant agreements were just common preliminary assumptions he and I shared. We had agreed on them before we started our main discussion, not after. So, they are not part of our conclusion. In fact, we didn't have a meaningful conclusion. All he said in his last comment seemed conclusive but did not really conclude anything. Those were our views since the start.

Well, what did we really discuss? I gave two specific reasons for not starting with soft-authoritarianism, especially citing the example of Indonesia. I argued for starting with a less perfect but fundamentally functioning democracy. He preferred soft-authoritarianism but didn't say specifically why. Instead, he rebutted that the pre-Reformasi Indonesia was soft-authoritarian. I argued back that it was a harsh dictatorship that committed many atrocities. Then, he agreed that it did commit atrocities, adding that it was backed by US. However, he didn't make himself clear whether he still regarded it as soft-authoritarian or ruthlessly dictatorial. Rather unexpectedly, he instead concluded our discussion supposedly.

So, what's the value of the discussion? I don't know. However, I did gain something from it. I got a wake-up call from you who smartly pointed out the pointlessness of our discussion. Now, you may even want to ask me again what the point of my explaining all these to you is. Actually, my explanation is not for a smart guy like you. It is for the primary kids.

Anonymous said...

Nowadays...

All myanmar primary kids' need is...

Action speak very louder than words...

They'll be so sick of...

these kinds of talks...in very near future...

JD said...

"They'll be so sick of...

these kinds of talks..."

They or you ? If "they" were "you", JUST BUG OFF! WHO CARES?

Anonymous said...

Hi JD..

Is't call value of discussion...?

Keep it that way..!

JD said...

So far, I've seen no points as well as no values in your so- called discussion except the blaming or showing your sickness for other's comments.
That's why I suggested you to just stay away for your own mental health.It's not good for you to feel sick of somebody everyday. You have a choice, Man! Be free from anger.

Anonymous said...

Hi..

Based on your attitude & the way you talk..

you shall be member of Army' SPDC...in Style...

They'll be proud of you..

keep up..boy..!

Nice day..!

Anonymous said...

..

Means for JD...above..

Anonymous said...

Hi! Anon (above)

Yes, better for u to keep away from that stupid gays ( not guy) (Nga Paw, MMM & JD ).
That is their attitude. Every body can see it in their comments and reply.( not only in this post)
Still u dont know?

Let them say whatever they want. No point to discuss with them positively.

Anonymous said...

ကိုေပါေရ
ကို ေပါ ဆိုတဲ့ အတိုင္း ေပါလြန္းၿပီး အေတြးအေခၚက နံုခ်ာလြန္းပါတယ္ ဗ်ာ....
တခ်ိဳ ့စကားေတြမွန္ေပမယ့္
နိုင္ငံၿခားသား ယူထားတဲ့သူကိုေတာ့ အထင္မၾကီးဘူးဗ်ိဳ ့....

fddfddgg said...

“ လူတစ္ေယာက္ဟာ နိင္ငံကို မခ်စ္ရင္ အမ်ိဳးကိုလည္း အထင္မၾကီးေတာ့ဘူး ၊ ကိုယ့္ရဲ႕ အမ်ိဳးအႏြယ္ကို ေစာင့္ေရွာက္သင့္တယ္ ဆုိတာကိုလည္း
သတိမရေတာ့ဘူး။ မ်ိဳးဆက္ ဆုိတာဟာ ပ်က္ျပီဆိုရင္ တျဖည္းျဖည္းနဲ႔
တိမ္ေကာျပီး ေပ်ာက္သြားတက္တယ္

မိတ္ေဆြ…. စကၤာပူႏုိင္ငံသား ခံယူဖုိ႔ စိတ္ကူးေနသလား။ ဒီစာကုိ အရင္ဖတ္ၾကည့္ဖုိ႔ တုိက္တြန္းပါရေစ။



စကၤာပူႏုိင္ငံေရး တေစ့တေစာင္း သိေကာင္းစရာ...
Websites
Blogs